<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pretentious. Pompous. Wanker.</title>
	<link>http://kenalovell.com/blog/2007/07/28/pretentious-pompous-wanker/</link>
	<description>Guru = Pahlawan Tanpa Tanda Jasa</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Manolis</title>
		<link>http://kenalovell.com/blog/2007/07/28/pretentious-pompous-wanker/#comment-5108</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kenalovell.com/blog/2007/07/28/pretentious-pompous-wanker/#comment-5108</guid>
					<description>Cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lambro</title>
		<link>http://kenalovell.com/blog/2007/07/28/pretentious-pompous-wanker/#comment-4557</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kenalovell.com/blog/2007/07/28/pretentious-pompous-wanker/#comment-4557</guid>
					<description>Interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MorningDude</title>
		<link>http://kenalovell.com/blog/2007/07/28/pretentious-pompous-wanker/#comment-2967</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kenalovell.com/blog/2007/07/28/pretentious-pompous-wanker/#comment-2967</guid>
					<description>And Abbott is saying the whole Haneef affair is just as much Labor's fault as they were given the same briefing as the government (I bet that's bull) and fully supported the government.

As if the government would have behaved any differently if Labor had protested. In fact there was plenty of opposition to the way they were handling Haneef outside of the Labor party, yet chose to either completely ignore them or lambasted them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Abbott is saying the whole Haneef affair is just as much Labor&#8217;s fault as they were given the same briefing as the government (I bet that&#8217;s bull) and fully supported the government.</p>
<p>As if the government would have behaved any differently if Labor had protested. In fact there was plenty of opposition to the way they were handling Haneef outside of the Labor party, yet chose to either completely ignore them or lambasted them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stu</title>
		<link>http://kenalovell.com/blog/2007/07/28/pretentious-pompous-wanker/#comment-2964</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kenalovell.com/blog/2007/07/28/pretentious-pompous-wanker/#comment-2964</guid>
					<description>And now Andrews is saying that he is suspicious of Haneef because he went back to India so quickly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now Andrews is saying that he is suspicious of Haneef because he went back to India so quickly!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chui</title>
		<link>http://kenalovell.com/blog/2007/07/28/pretentious-pompous-wanker/#comment-2951</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kenalovell.com/blog/2007/07/28/pretentious-pompous-wanker/#comment-2951</guid>
					<description>The Howard government played it like a classic wedge issue. 200 police officers tied up running this investigation. If there were 5 Haneef's running about in Australia the police would be overwhelmed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Howard government played it like a classic wedge issue. 200 police officers tied up running this investigation. If there were 5 Haneef&#8217;s running about in Australia the police would be overwhelmed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.392 seconds -->
