God bless America (and screw everyone else)
January 24, 2007 on 2:13 pm | In Uncategorized |I try not to be reflexively anti-American but I do think there are good objective reasons for the global wave of anti-Americanism illustrated in a recent survey. Despite the rhetoric, despite the carefully-nurtured public image as the leader of the free world and moral champion of democracy against the forces of evil, the evidence is that the Bush Administration is concerned exclusively with the interests of one group of people: citizens of the US of A. To protect those interests, the Bushistas are prepared to ruin the lives of countless millions who happen to live in the wrong countries.
The invasion and occupation of Iraq have so far been the cause of hundreds of thousands of deaths and an even greater number of people being maimed. There can hardly be a family in Iraq that has not suffered the pain of bereavement. Millions of Iraqis have been made homeless. None of this seems to matter to the Bushistas. They care so little about the human consequences of their blundering violence in the War on Terror that they don’t even bother trying to keep count of deaths and injuries and refugees. They’re simply not relevant data.
In case somebody is extreme enough to argue that Muslims all share some kind of collective guilt for September 11 so they deserve what’s coming to them, the Iraqi occupation has seen the local Christians treated as harshly as anyone. According to those notorious terrorist-sympathising lefties from the Church of England, 350,000 Iraqi Christians have fled Iraq since the invasion. But for the Bushistas these facts are just not on the radar - the Iraqi occupation is justified because it’s in American interests, period.
During the second world war, German occupiers on a few occasions killed local citizens in reprisal for the killing of a German soldier: 10 for 1, or when the monster Heydrich was assassinated, 100 to 1 from memory. These comparatively isolated incidents are rightly remembered as evidence of the moral bankruptcy of the Nazi regime. Yet a similar rationale has marked the Bushistas’ response to September 11. In some ways it’s even more unnerving because at least reprisal killings in hot blood reflect an instinct for revenge that’s a common response to deliberate violence in the human race. In the case of the Bushistas, kill ratios of 100:1 or more are simply accepted with a shrug. They’re not deliberately inflicted nor are they especially regretted. They just are.
Ever since 2001 and the chest-beating childishness of ‘You’re either with us or against us’, the Bushistas have demonstrated a total disregard for the opinions or welfare of any other nation on earth. And now, of course, they are showing the same disregard for the opinions of their own Congress and the majority of the American people.
In these circumstances it’s not at all surprising that only 29% of people around the world think the USA is a positive influence in the world. Indeed it’s a wonder the figure isn’t lower; no doubt there is a lingering affection and respect for the nation that we all once thought we knew.
As one of the invaders and occupiers, what has Australia done to recognise the plight of refugees fleeing the sectarian violence that we helped unleash? Well we’ve spent $250 million on a new detention centre on Christmas Island … because we decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come.
And the US intake this year for the Iraqi refugees who owe their misery overwhelmingly to Bush’s invasion?
500.
The price that the USA will pay for their blatant lack of interest in anybody’s welfare other than their own will be a heavy one, and it will continue to be paid for many years. Its claims to have some special moral standing in the world community have perhaps been extinguished forever.
This will be the legacy of the incompetent ideologue who today presented the latest version of The State of the Bush Alternative Reality.
4 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^
Re. the point in the first or second paragraph, it’s worse than that: as my good American friend would attest, the Bush administration (and I would argue, most any administration) only really acts on behalf of the top one percent. Top ten per cent, if we’re being generous. So while poor Americans (forget middle class, they won’t have one in a generation) may be lucky enough to avoid the bombing raids of those in Iraq, they certainly know which way the cookie crumbles.
I’d advocate compulsory voting as the only way to save America’s ageing democracy, but it’d be a futile argument of course. Hell, we’ll be lucky to keep ours (compulsory voting, that is).
Comment by Kieran — January 24, 2007 #
I personally (not to clog up your comments page, but whatever) blame the French Revolution for imparting a lot of ideas into the nascent American republic way back when. I’m no academic, but I strongly suspect the magical/mythic speech that we hear to this day in Presidential speeches owes a lot to the very close historical proximity of the two revolutions - I think the young US took up a lot of that stuff and forgot it wasn’t the only one.
If George the Third had been a little more forthcoming and the French a few decades late in letting those wild ideas of theirs out into the world, I suspect the US might have evolved into a peaceable little commonwealth nation (albeit a very rich one).
You said in another post that you’re somewhat of an isolationist at heart. I’d tend to sympathise with that view, and wish the US would have exercised a bit more of that over the years, cause frankly it has no goddamn right to behave as it does.
Comment by Kieran — January 24, 2007 #
I agree with you about compulsory voting Kieran and you’re right about the French Revolution. People like Thomas Paine, who had a strong influence on the US constitution, were inspired by ‘liberte, egalite, fraternite’ and in today’s context would be regarded as the maddest of mad lefties. In fact of course the French Revolution was mainly the work of the middle class who would have regarded the prospect of the peasant majority taking power with almost as much horror as the aristocracy.
It’s a widespread flaw in the rhetoric of democracy. it was all very well for Aristotle to stroll about talking about the rights of the citizen but he didn’t have women in mind … and the reason he had so much free time was that Athens had a huge slave population to do all the hard labour.
I read Webb’s reply to the State of the Union speech today with interest. He got on to the human cost of the Iraqi occupation but I looked in vain for any recognition that this cost was mainly being born by the Iraqis. To read Bush and Webb, you’d think the only people suffering in Iraq are Americans.
When I start getting more than 20 comments a day you can start worrying about clogging up my comments
.
Comment by Administrator — January 24, 2007 #
I laughed at your first line. I struggle with this one, having lived in the US for over ten years. I have many friends there, but it is just so easy. Although Americans are not as insular as other countries like Japan, for most Americans, the world starts and stops at the borders. Dangerous out there, with all those wacky muslims, commies…running around trying to overrun our way of life. It is very easy to play to this audience, hence so much baloney from US leaders. They are not speaking to the world, just their backyard, giving them what they want.
Comment by Colin Campbell — February 2, 2007 #